| 2016 College Football | ||||
| Dwiggins Power Rankings | ||||
| Posted 16 Oct 2016 | ||||
| 1. | Michigan | 117.8 | ||
| 2. | Alabama | 113.1 | ||
| 3. | Ohio State | 111.2 | ||
| 4. | Clemson | 102.3 | ||
| 5. | Texas A&M | 97.2 | ||
| 6. | Washington | 96.2 | ||
| 7. | Western Michigan | 94.6 | ||
| 8. | Louisville | 93.1 | ||
| 9. | West Virginia | 86.6 | ||
| 10. | Houston | 84.8 | ||
| 11. | Auburn | 83.8 | ||
| 12. | Wisconsin | 83.7 | ||
| 13. | Florida State | 82.0 | ||
| 14. | Washington St. | 80.5 | ||
| 15. | Oklahoma | 80.4 | ||
| 16. | Boise State | 78.8 | ||
| 17. | LSU | 78.8 | ||
| 18. | Memphis | 78.4 | ||
| 19. | Nebraska | 77.4 | ||
| 20. | South Florida | 76.9 | ||
| 21. | Mississippi | 76.5 | ||
| 22. | Colorado | 76.3 | ||
| 23. | Tennessee | 75.5 | ||
| 24. | Florida | 73.5 | ||
| 25. | North Carolina | 71.9 | ||
| 26. | Arkansas | 71.0 | ||
| 27. | Miami (Fla.) | 70.5 | ||
| 28. | Virginia Tech | 70.2 | ||
| 29. | Baylor | 70.0 | ||
| 30. | Brigham Young | 69.5 | ||
| 31. | Troy | 68.5 | ||
| 32. | Southern Cal | 67.6 | ||
| 33. | Stanford | 65.6 | ||
| 34. | Navy | 65.6 | ||
| 35. | Toledo | 65.4 | ||
| 36. | N. C. State | 64.1 | ||
| 37. | Penn State | 62.9 | ||
| 38. | Pittsburgh | 60.5 | ||
| 39. | Kansas State | 60.4 | ||
| 40. | Appalachian St. | 60.3 | ||
| 41. | Utah | 59.7 | ||
| 42. | Arizona State | 57.0 | ||
| 43. | Oklahoma State | 56.8 | ||
| 44. | Wake Forest | 55.7 | ||
| 45. | Georgia Tech | 54.8 | ||
| 46. | Temple | 54.7 | ||
| 47. | UCLA | 54.1 | ||
| 48. | Minnesota | 53.0 | ||
| 49. | Iowa | 52.6 | ||
| 50. | TCU | 52.6 | ||
| 51. | Tulsa | 51.8 | ||
| 52. | Central Florida | 51.7 | ||
| 53. | San Diego State | 51.4 | ||
| 54. | Northwestern | 50.8 | ||
| 55. | Georgia | 50.7 | ||
| 56. | Central Michigan | 50.6 | ||
| 57. | Wyoming | 49.7 | ||
| 58. | Louisiana Tech | 49.5 | ||
| 59. | Old Dominion | 48.5 | ||
| 60. | W. Kentucky | 48.4 | ||
| 61. | Army | 48.2 | ||
| 62. | Indiana | 47.6 | ||
| 63. | Air Force | 47.0 | ||
| 64. | Texas | 45.6 | ||
| 65. | Texas Tech | 45.6 | ||
| 66. | Middle Tennessee | 44.7 | ||
| 67. | Tulane | 43.4 | ||
| 68. | Maryland | 43.3 | ||
| 69. | California | 43.2 | ||
| 70. | Connecticut | 43.0 | ||
| 71. | Akron | 42.9 | ||
| 72. | Missouri | 42.2 | ||
| 73. | Oregon | 42.1 | ||
| 74. | Kentucky | 41.5 | ||
| 75. | Vanderbilt | 40.2 | ||
| 76. | Eastern Michigan | 39.8 | ||
| 77. | Miss. State | 39.5 | ||
| 78. | Georgia Southern | 39.4 | ||
| 79. | Southern Miss. | 38.0 | ||
| 80. | East Carolina | 37.8 | ||
| 81. | Cincinnati | 37.4 | ||
| 82. | Duke | 37.2 | ||
| 83. | Syracuse | 37.1 | ||
| 84. | Colorado State | 36.4 | ||
| 85. | Idaho | 34.5 | ||
| 86. | South Carolina | 34.1 | ||
| 87. | Arkansas State | 33.7 | ||
| 88. | UT - San Antonio | 33.6 | ||
| 89. | Ohio | 33.4 | ||
| 90. | South Alabama | 33.3 | ||
| 91. | New Mexico | 32.9 | ||
| 92. | Ball State | 32.6 | ||
| 93. | Notre Dame | 32.4 | ||
| 94. | Utah State | 32.4 | ||
| 95. | Virginia | 31.3 | ||
| 96. | Michigan State | 30.9 | ||
| 97. | Oregon State | 30.5 | ||
| 98. | Northern Illinois | 29.1 | ||
| 99. | Arizona | 28.2 | ||
| 100. | Boston College | 27.7 | ||
| 101. | SMU | 26.9 | ||
| 102. | Hawai'i | 26.8 | ||
| 103. | Illinois | 26.5 | ||
| 104. | UNLV | 26.3 | ||
| 105. | Georgia State | 24.8 | ||
| 106. | Kent State | 23.6 | ||
| 107. | North Texas | 20.9 | ||
| 108. | Massachusetts | 19.9 | ||
| 109. | Iowa State | 19.4 | ||
| 110. | Purdue | 18.0 | ||
| 111. | UL-Monroe | 18.0 | ||
| 112. | UL-Lafayette | 17.1 | ||
| 113. | Nevada | 15.2 | ||
| 114. | Marshall | 13.8 | ||
| 115. | Miami-Ohio | 13.2 | ||
| 116. | Rutgers | 12.3 | ||
| 117. | Bowling Green | 10.7 | ||
| 118. | New Mexico St. | 9.2 | ||
| 119. | San Jose State | 9.2 | ||
| 120. | Texas State | 7.6 | ||
| 121. | Texas - El Paso | 5.6 | ||
| 122. | Fresno State | 4.7 | ||
| 123. | Kansas | 3.6 | ||
| 124. | Charlotte | 2.7 | ||
| 125. | Rice | 2.2 | ||
| 126. | Florida Int'l | 1.6 | ||
| 127. | Buffalo | 1.3 | ||
| 128. | Florida Atlantic | -3.3 | ||
| As the season progresses, | ||||
| these rankings are based more | ||||
| on win/loss records, and less on | ||||
| large margins of victory. | ||||
| For predictions of game outcomes, | ||||
| visit my Prognostication page at | ||||
| http://dpdsdogs.com/ncaa/prog.htm | ||||